The
second class I visited was an inclusion class. When we got there, the teacher
had a few minutes left of her lunch break, but she allowed us to wait in her
classroom until her break was over and her new class began. She let us look at
copies of the book the students were reading, which was called Things Fall Apart. The copies she let us
look at were very interesting because they looked like normal books, but there
were vocab words bolded and then defined at the bottom of the page. There were
also questions at the end of every chapter about things like the theme. The
teacher did mention that this particular class was an inclusion class so I felt
that those types of additions to the book would be helpful to them. When the
class began, the students did not seem very interested in participating. She
would ask if someone would like to read and she would be met with dead silence.
It appeared that not every student had their book with them either. While I
found the teacher likeable, there was just no excitement in the class and this
was actually quite the opposite of other classes I’ve seen where the students
are very eager to read out loud and share things with the class.
The
third class I visited just so happened to be one of those full-of-excitement
classes. I had never visited this class before and I really loved the energy in
the room. They were discussing different types of irony and filling out a sheet
as a class. Students would volunteer to read a scenario that illustrated a
certain type of irony and then students would identify what type it was.
Everyone was very eager to participate, read scenarios, and discuss certain
aspects of what they had read and/or what they thought the answer was and why.
At one point, a scenario was read about Eminem swearing in his songs, but not
allowing his children to swear. It ended up sparking a sort of debate over
whether or not Eminem was really being hypocritical. I think this energy really
did have a lot to do with the fact that the scenario included a rapper that the
students would be familiar with at the very least. It would have been different
if the scenario had talked about a singer that the students didn’t know or
enjoy. This shows how important it is to know your students and what gets them
excited and eager to talk and participate. People are always more comfortable
talking about what they know and like, so being able to tie interests into the
lesson is so beneficial.
Having gone into all three of those classrooms also, I agree that the third class was the best one of the day. It is definitely extremely useful to connect student interests to the lessons if we are ever going to get students to participate in class. I'm curious as to what other techniques could be used to connect lessons to student interests. Do you have anything in mind already?
ReplyDeleteI agree, Nate. I was also in the second class and while I agree there was little in the way of excitement, I think the teacher's classroom management skills were excellent. They had a prompt at the beginning of class that most students appeared engaged with, which I thought was great. But you're right - students didn't appear eager to participate. I think this comes down to the content. Although I was only in there for a short period of time, there didn't appear to be any attempt on the teacher's part to try to connect the novel to the students' lives. Whereas the "full-of-excitement" was doing a lesson on irony using "real world" examples. So I think that's what it comes down to: connecting the content to the lives of the students.
ReplyDeleteRegarding the second classroom. I see a lot of potential there. The teacher had a handle on a class of seniors, which is not an easy feat, but there was not a lot of enjoyment on the student end. The point of education is not always to make the students giddy with excitement, but in this case the lesson could have used some glossing up. If one of us is placed with this teacher, it is possible that there will be great success because her expectations were clear and the content is interesting. There just needs to be a more light-hearted, true to life approach to the task at hand and one of us could bring that about.
ReplyDelete